| Height | Weight | Punches | Blood |
| Duration 0:07 | Thrown | Landed | Big |
| Darcy Tucker | 5'10''  2 | 178lb  18 | 4 | 3 | 0 | A Bit |
| Francis Bouillon | 5'8'' 2 | 196lb 18 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Added By re | Log in or Register to edit this event's boxscore | Review this event | Post Message about this event | Loved/Hated/Top 10 | Compare these fighters |
|
| Links | Video Clip available from 8 traders |
| Fan | Review |
 hb11
3518 fight reviews
Dec 6, 2006 09:30 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
6 |
| Bouillon throws a nice check into the boards stopping a rush into the Montreal zone. Tucker runs Bouillon into the boards. Bouillon gets up, drops his gloves and faces up to Tucker. Tucker moves toward Bouillon and pushes his gloves into Bouillon's face. Bouillon drops him with a right. I wouldn't call this unfair since Tucker clearly knew Bouillon's intentions when he saw him discard his gloves. Tucker doesn't hide from the fight but he doesn't drop the gloves either. He actually eggs Bouillon on with the pushing and shoving and Bouillon just metes out justice. Nice TKO punch. |
Oneill.the.Giant
2890 fight reviews
Dec 5, 2008 09:29 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
7 |
Bouillon hits a Toronto player into the boards hard, and gets a cheer from the crowd. Tucker then comes in and he checks Bouillon hard, Bouillon falls to the ice but gets up and drops the gloves and skates towards Tucker.
Bouillon grabs Tucker but Tucker keeps his gloves on, they exchange a few pushes before the lino's come in between them. Tucker gives Bouillon two glove shots to the face before Bouillon responds with a short hard right hand, it lands flush on Tuckers face and Tucker goes down to the ice.
When Tucker got up he had blood coming from his nose, and he's not happy looking as he skates to the penalty box. This is a TKO win Bouillon as he drops Tucker with a punch, Tucker and Bouillon would drop the gloves later on in the season.
TKO win Bouillon. |
SarcasticPillow
11243 fight reviews
Oct 6, 2010 14:31 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
5 |
| Francis Bouillon levels Kyle Wellwood on a rush and then Darcy Tucker runs Bouillon despite the puck being nowhere near. Bouillon gets up and drops his gloves, going right after Tucker. Tucker shoves at Bouillon as he grabs on and then continues pushing Bouillon back. Bouillon then starts throwing as the referees come in. Bouillon gets off three right hands and lands two with the last one dropping Tucker cleanly. Bouillon lands a right as Tucker is going down and when Tucker gets up, he jaws with Bouillon. Tucker never dropped his gloves while engaged with Bouillon but was shoving back. However Bouillon began throwing and dropped (and cut) Tucker. |
re
9347 fight reviews
Dec 2, 2006 16:54 ET | Francis Bouillon decisive win | Fun
5 |
| Nice to see. Boulion nails Wellwood. Tucker comes over and nails Boulion who doesn't have the puck so Boulion drops his gloves. Tucker though pussies out and keeps his gloves on. Boulion grabs Tucker and Tucker pushes him. Boulion says something Tucker gets pissed starts throwing gloves on punches. but Boulion lands one good shot then another that puts Tucker down bloodied. |
moisty69
589 fight reviews
Dec 2, 2006 16:55 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
6 |
|
drwdan19
1236 fight reviews
Dec 2, 2006 16:55 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
6 |
| I would call this unfair. Bouillon drills a Leaf and Tucker goes after him. Tucker lays a hard body check on Bouillon, who immediately gets up and drops the gloves. He tries to goad Tucker into a fight but he doesn't drop them. The linesmen come in and Tucker gets dropped by a punch. It looked like Tucker was out of position to defend himself. |
goleafsgo987
895 fight reviews
Dec 2, 2006 16:59 ET | Francis Bouillon decisive win | Fun
3 |
IMO this isn't a fight. If it is, its definatley unfair because there was too much interference. Good game though, we will see some fight eventually.
EDIT: I seen this again, and changed my review. This was definately unfair. |
brookbank-28
112 fight reviews
Dec 2, 2006 17:05 ET | Francis Bouillon decisive win | Fun
3 |
| well rough IMO they didnt get majors and tucker didnt drop the gloves |
CDD
4386 fight reviews
4 fight logs
Dec 2, 2006 17:14 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
4 |
if this stays as a fight its a one punch TKO for Bouillon as he droped Tucker and Tucker had a mouse under his eye from the punch.
Bouillon lays out a Toronto player and then Tucker charges him into the boards and Bouillon wants after him and throws off his gloves and grabs Tucker and trys to get his gloves off, they shove and throw some gloved punches and as the linesman start to make there way between them Bouillon cracks Tucker who drops like a sack of potatoes.
Bouillon showed clear intent to fight. |
vinner
835 fight reviews
Dec 2, 2006 20:12 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
4 |
Wellwood gets cranked ... Tucker goes after him and levels him ... Bouillion gets up without the gloves and grabs Tucker ... Tucker glove punches him and the linesman begin to come in as Bouillion drills Tucker knocking him to the ice .. Tucker gets up very and angry with blood pouring from his nose and has a small cut under his eye ..
Unfair TKO victory Francois Bouillion. |
leafsfan77
18 fight reviews
Dec 2, 2006 20:27 ET | Francis Bouillon clear win | Fun
4 |
| Bouillon is gay he nails wellwood and then tucker comes in to protect his team and nails him without the puck Bouillon gets up and drops them but tucker does not want to fight and Bouillon throws a shot when tucker is off balance...Belak would of whooped bouillons ass. |
captainron
25 fight reviews
Dec 2, 2006 20:34 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
6 |
| It was very satisfying to see Darcy get dropped by Bouillion he had blood on his nose and a mark on his eye. |
mullet
16664 fight reviews
Dec 3, 2006 04:20 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
4 |
| Good job by Bouillon dropping his gloves and nailing Tucker. Tucker was a pussy for not dropping his gloves and got what he deserved. |
nickpreyde
147 fight reviews
Dec 3, 2006 08:43 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
5 |
| tucker nails boullion who doesnt hvae the ouck and boullion comes after him gloves off tucker throws a few glove punches then boullion gets him straight in the nose and tucker drops |
Bonneau
156 fight reviews
Dec 3, 2006 10:50 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
5 |
| Bouillon gave a big punch right on the nose of Tucker |
gooftick
670 fight reviews
Dec 3, 2006 21:28 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
7 |
| Tucker wanted absolutly nothing to do with this non fighter as he just took a punch and went down. |
Turner17
972 fight reviews
Dec 4, 2006 15:25 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
5 |
|
14shanahan14
538 fight reviews
Dec 4, 2006 16:32 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
8 |
| I rate this high because I hate Tucker with a passion. This was great to see Tucker get flattened by a right hand. |
lilburtis9363
869 fight reviews
Dec 6, 2006 13:07 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
7 |
| it's a fair fight..boullion levels someone and tucker gives him a cheap hit that could have injured him, boullion gets up and drops the gloves and is waiting for tucker to throw his down, tucker throws a bunch of gloved lefts, and then boullion lands a big right that drops tucker |
mofor
894 fight reviews
Dec 17, 2006 07:37 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
5 |
| Not decisive win but a TKO. Tucker should of just dropped the gloves instead of takin that from the beginning. |
ShootFace
1691 fight reviews
1 fight log
Mar 8, 2007 19:26 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
4 |
|
Owned33
438 fight reviews
1 fight log
Mar 14, 2007 13:53 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
8 |
|
skacore
1009 fight reviews
Mar 17, 2007 19:59 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
3 |
| Bouillon drops Tucker in a scrum |
Matteo
74 fight reviews
Apr 6, 2007 14:58 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
6 |
| Good job by Bouillon. He took his revenge on Tucker. |
Zdeno
936 fight reviews
Apr 21, 2007 01:35 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
5 |
|
thekiller
10 fight reviews
Jun 1, 2007 15:24 ET | Francis Bouillon win by TKO | Fun
7 |
| bouillon atteint tucker avec une solide droite au visage |
rochmacdubar
18 fight reviews
May 17, 2010 22:01 ET | Francis Bouillon win by KO | Fun
8 |
| Bouillon gets up from Tucker's hit and challenges him. They start to trade shoves and Bouillon hits Tucker right on the nose. Tucker gets knocked down by the punch as the refs come over to intervene. |
| Messages |
CDD
Dec 2, 2006 16:54 ET | 17:50 TUCKER, D. : Charging - 2 min
17:50 TUCKER, D. : Roughing - 2 min
17:50 BOUILLON, F. : Roughing - 2 min | Reply |
re
Dec 2, 2006 17:01 ET | I don't think this is unfair Tucker hit Boulion with about 3 good gloved punch before Boulion hit Tucker with the one good gloves off punch. | Reply |
CDD
Dec 2, 2006 17:04 ET | if this is going to be called Unfair it needs to be because Tucker never inteaded to fight back, not because of interference. The refs had nothing to do with Tucker not dropping his gloves and fighting back, they had nothing to do with Tucker being droped from one punch. They werent between them yet and if they were Tucker wouldnt have droped to the ice because the ref would have been holding him. So dont say interference is the reason this is unfair it would be because Tucker bitched out and didnt want to fight. | Reply |
alexmarr
Dec 2, 2006 17:05 ET | i rated this an 8 because my brother is a big leaf fan an i hate them, an he loves tucker, so it was extra special for me to see him get punched | Reply |
goleafsgo987
Dec 2, 2006 17:06 ET | Awfully stupid reason to rate it an 8. | Reply |
alexmarr
Dec 2, 2006 17:07 ET | goleafsgo your just mad because your sweatheart tucker got puched, boohoo | Reply |
goleafsgo987
Dec 2, 2006 17:09 ET | Yes, I do like tucker, he is may favorite player I will admit that. I don't think it is right to give a fight a high fun rating based solely on who was in the fight. | Reply |
alexmarr
Dec 2, 2006 17:10 ET | ya but when you rate it it says for rating it 8, worth watching the game to see the fight, and for me it deffintly was | Reply |
CDD
Dec 2, 2006 17:13 ET | | | Awfully stupid reason to rate it an 8. |
if your a leafs fan it is...but the reason is its a 8 for fun...its based on how much fun it was watching it. | Reply |
goleafsgo987
Dec 2, 2006 17:16 ET | but do you think it was worth the game to watch the fight... | Reply |
14shanahan14
Dec 2, 2006 19:52 ET | Boullion is my new hero.
captainron, you picked the wrong guy. | Reply |
garvulture
Dec 2, 2006 20:19 ET | I like Tucker, but man he gets mad and starts having one of his meltdown she looks like Donald Duck !! | Reply |
captainron
Dec 2, 2006 20:35 ET | my bad | Reply |
mofor
Dec 2, 2006 21:23 ET | Ha I knew this day would come, Tucker goes after a non-fighter and loses, can't wait to see this. You know i'm gonna be bias all over his ass. | Reply |
re
Dec 3, 2006 04:21 ET | LMAO this is the second hockey night in Canada in a row that Tuckers been punched out. | Reply |
re
Dec 3, 2006 04:25 ET | You know what theres no way this fights unfair. Tucker shouldn't have started glove punching a guy who had his gloves off whats he expect him to do. Not punch just cause he kept his gloves on. | Reply |
re
Dec 3, 2006 07:56 ET | Tucker has just as many fights as Belak now! | Reply |
no.7
Dec 4, 2006 10:06 ET | vinner,
How could you tell that Tucker never intended to fight back? Bouillon dropped him with his first punch, so Tucker simply didn't get a chance to fight back. This is different from "never intended to fight back", so your Unfair call is clearly wrong. Please cancel it, otherwise I'll have to do it.
I'm not saying that this fight can't be called Unfair for some other reason, but it clearly can't be called Unfair because Tucker never intended to fight back. | Reply |
re
Dec 4, 2006 12:58 ET | Heres a clip of it Tucker hits Boullion with 3 gloved punches before Boullion even throws one this isn't Unfair. | Reply |
re
Dec 4, 2006 13:01 ET | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRLypwrlVNU&mode=related&search= | Reply |
habsfan1987
Dec 16, 2006 05:47 ET | Some idiots like Howard Berger have called it unfair, but there's no way it is. Bouillon dropped his gloved and waited for Tucker to fight back, after Tucker punched him three times Bouillon punched him back. Tucker might not have wanted to fight back, but he certainly did. Even if Bouillon did cheap-shot (which he didn't), Tucker deserved it for his cheap-shot beforehand. | Reply |
huffer
Dec 19, 2006 14:29 ET | That's a little hypocritical, is it not? Here's exactly what you said last April, word for word, about Tucker when he jumped and beat Alfredsson at the end of a game:
From goleafsgo987
"i gave this baby a ten. call me a leaf homer if you want but i love nothing more than seeing tucks lay a beat down on rat boy"
So how can you call him out for giving this event an 8 when you did even worse (gave an event a 10) when a player you hated got beat down?!?! | Reply |
huffer
Dec 19, 2006 14:30 ET | Sorry, I should have pointed out the above is directed to goleafsgo987. | Reply |
goleafsgo987
Dec 19, 2006 20:28 ET | I admit I was a little caught in the moment on the other event. Thanks for pointing it out and I will change my review. | Reply |
MarkV
Dec 21, 2006 13:02 ET | This site is clearly consistent at being inconsistent. When everyone wants to call the Probert Semenko fight unfair, meanwhile Tucker gets dropped from a punch when his gloves were still on and everyone thinks that's the greatest and no one was allowed to call it unfair?. Being objective is awfully hard, being silly is so easy here it just seems if you don't like a player you lean more towards making bogus reviews.
Is it case closed when a player does not drop his gloves, therefore he doesn't intend to fight back? See Clark vs. Fetisov #2 that was called unfair? Yet in my eyes it's the same as Tucker vs. Bouillon. | Reply |
no.7
Dec 21, 2006 14:29 ET | | | everyone wants to call the Probert Semenko fight unfair |
Wrong. Several people who reviewed that fight could have called it Unfair but didn't.
| | Clark vs. Fetisov #2 that was called unfair? Yet in my eyes it's the same as Tucker vs. Bouillon. |
I don't have time to do it now, but I'll try to find and review that fight at the earliest opportunity.
Overall, considering how difficult it is to make Unfair calls consistently, the system has been working remarkably well. Vinner is probably the only one who had had his right to call Unfair suspended. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 16, 2007 16:44 ET | Please change this to an unfair fight as Tucker was suckered. | Reply |
Avery119
Mar 16, 2007 16:51 ET | Let's compare:
Tootoo vs Bootland
http://www.sendspace.com/file/rt0bmd
Tucker vs Bouillon
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-gskY6Oar6Q
Notice in the Tootoo scrap Bootland had his glove off first. Then Tootoo belts him. This is fair. | Reply |
no.7
Mar 16, 2007 16:58 ET | | | Please change this to an unfair fight as Tucker was suckered. |
I don't think that Tucker was suckered. He was the first to throw punches and should have expected to be punched back. | Reply |
no.7
Mar 16, 2007 17:03 ET | | Notice in the Tootoo scrap Bootland had his glove off first.
|
I couldn't see how Bootland's glove came off from the Nashville feed. In fact, I wasn't even sure it did come off. The only thing which was clear from that feed is that he had at least one glove on after getting dropped. | Reply |
Avery119
Mar 16, 2007 17:04 ET | He drops it at the same time as Tootoo. it's right by the boards. If this fight is fair, then the Tootoo fight is fair. | Reply |
no.7
Mar 16, 2007 17:05 ET | | | He drops it at the same time as Tootoo. |
Which feed did you watch? | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 16, 2007 17:06 ET | Great! now just take Tucker out of that sentence and put in Bootland and you have a player whom even dropped a glove (Bootland) if that's not intent to fight then Tootoo should wait for Bootland to get both gloves off and then wait for Bootland to punch him before we can call it an official fight? | Reply |
Avery119
Mar 16, 2007 17:06 ET | http://www.sendspace.com/file/rt0bmd
Nashville. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 16, 2007 17:07 ET | Watch Bootlands right hand he's holding Tootoo's jersey at the throat area, clearly a fighters favourite area to grab when they don't want to tussle. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 16, 2007 17:13 ET | How do you know Tucker wasn't trying to draw a penalty? it was a close game! | Reply |
no.7
Mar 16, 2007 17:22 ET | You can't see HOW Bootland dropped his right glove on the Nashville feed.
If Bootland intended to fight Tootoo, he would have dropped both his gloves. | Reply |
no.7
Mar 16, 2007 17:31 ET | | | How do you know Tucker wasn't trying to draw a penalty? |
This question is irrelevant for the purpose of calling the fight Unfair.
The key question is this: are you sure that Tucker's intent was not to fight Bouillon, but trick him into taking a penalty? I don't think so.
By contrast, I think that Bootland's intent was not to fight Tootoo but trick him into taking a penalty.
That is the difference. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 16, 2007 17:40 ET | Now you're whitewashing everything, it's easy to say what someone was thinking when the desired result wasn't achieved.
To me Tucker didn't turtle and niether did Bootland, We've all seen players facewash other players and Tuckers gloved punches had little steam on them, kinda like go ahead take a swing at me. Bootland stopped Tootoo with a little tap on his leg as if to say "let's go" and Tootoo obliged. This is something I have seen a thousand times.
Now you really can't see that Bootlands glove was off? please are Avery119 and I the only ones? | Reply |
no.7
Mar 16, 2007 17:49 ET | All this is irrelevant. Answer this question: are you sure that Tucker's intent was not to fight Bouillon, but trick him into taking a penalty? | Reply |
no.7
Mar 16, 2007 17:52 ET | | | Now you really can't see that Bootlands glove was off? please are Avery119 and I the only ones? |
As I said above, you can't see HOW Bootland's right glove came off.
The only way forward is to see if Detroit feed shows that. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 16, 2007 18:07 ET | I'm going to go with wichever answer gets this fight called unfair as the Bootland Tootoo one!
You feel that Bootland was trying to goad Tootoo into a penalty, I don't!
But Drwdan19, CDD, Anthony19, 14Shanahan14 and Owned33 all believe that this was unfair and there was little reason for people (other than Redwing fans) to think it wasn't. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 16, 2007 18:09 ET | You know what you're right his glove never came off because their tied to his sleeves. I give up! | Reply |
no.7
Mar 16, 2007 18:14 ET | | | I'm going to go with wichever answer gets this fight called unfair as the Bootland Tootoo one! |
Is this more important to you than to make the right call? | Reply |
re
Mar 16, 2007 19:11 ET | This fight is fair. I don't think Tucker had intent to "fight". But he was hitting Boulion with glove shots obvisouly because he didn't think Boulion would throw a punch with the gloves off because he thought Boulion would be scared to take to extra penalty. Well he was wrong.Tucker decided to look tough infront of Toronto fans and he paid for it. Theres no way Boulion suckerd him because he clearly threw the mits off after the hit by Tucker. Tucker cleary saw Boulion wanted to fight. Boulion grabbed on Tucker who decided not to fist fight but to throw glove punches. So Boulion defended him self and threw a punch back. So no I don't think Tucker had intent to fist fight but he made it so Boulion had to defende himself. So yes this is a fair fight. And Tucker deserves a loss on his card because he decided to throw punches. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 08:36 ET | Then how is this different from Bootland and Tootoo? This is the only reason I brought this up, if this is fair how is Bootland and Tootoo unfair?
Nevermind the details I have eyes and saw both incidents, and they both have the same smell to them. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 08:48 ET | I have tried and tried to proove mycase for this incident and all I get is rhetoric. I give up with this and hope that you're happy running a site that's consistent at being inconsistent based on who the favourites are. I have to sit here and justify every detail and have gone over all the reasons why it should be a fair fight? I am probably correct by saying that most other users don't have to go through the gauntlet to get their calls turned to the correct one?
From intent to fight by dropping his glove, to throwing a gloved punch at Tootoo, to the tap on the shin pads (universal gesture for "Let's go") to the fact that in our own rules intent to fight may still be defined if a player did not get his gloves off in time or was/is playing in Europe and threw punches. This is plain and simple and if the right call cannot be made then I'm confident that there is an EXTREME bias towards players on this site by registered users and it goes ignored, undetected and/or accepted. | Reply |
re
Mar 17, 2007 10:46 ET | The difference is.. That Tootoo and Bootland where roughing it up and Tootoo threw his gloves off and surprised Bootland with punches. Tucker clearly saw Boulion throw his gloves off chelllangen him then Boulion grabbed Tucker where Tucker started punching Boulion even though Boulion had his mits off. If you look at the Tootoo incident Tootoo drop his gloves quickly and poped Bootland before Bootland could get his mits off. So theres a difference | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 11:12 ET | Bootland had one glove off and waas holding on for dear life after he got punched.
Tucker had no steam behind his gloved jabs, he was enticing Bouillion to throw a punch, one which I don't think Tucker thought he would do. Does gloves on mean a fight? We've all seen Tucker throw a punch before and what he can do with it. There is no difference if Bootland dropped at least one of his gloves, even if he was trying to trick Tootoo into a penalty he should have been ready for it like Tucker should have. Besides Tucker's not going to drop his gloves to hit a girl either! | Reply |
re
Mar 17, 2007 11:30 ET | Tootoo though suckerd Bootland. Sure Bootland has intent but Tootoo got his punches off before Bootland had a chance to fight back. Tucker started punching Boulion so Boulion acted in self defence and punched Tucker back there for if Boulion had to defende himself its a fair fight.. If this was the case with Bootland it would have been fair too/ | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 11:43 ET | Bootland drops his glove and throws a gloved right at Tootoo, is Tootoo supposed to wait for Bootland to punch him 3 times before he knows he's in a fight?
Not even close to being a sucker punch, a sucker punch is when the guys not even squared up or looking at you, this was clear as day as Bootland wasn't ready for the faster Tootoo. | Reply |
re
Mar 17, 2007 11:46 ET | No but its the same as Dale Purinton vs Cairns Tootoo droped his gloves before Bootland and got in rights before Bootland had a chance so it was unfair because Bootland had no way of fighting back. Tucker threw glove shot when Boulion clearly had the gloves off so what did he expect. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 11:48 ET | Look at the video again, Bootland throws his left glove off before Tootoo throws his off. I think he wanted to shake hands! | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 11:48 ET | What did Bootland expect when he threw his glove off? | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 11:49 ET | sorry his right glove | Reply |
re
Mar 17, 2007 12:05 ET | Whatever I don't feel like arguing anymore you have your opinion and I have mine. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 12:18 ET | Hey, I was appealing to No.7, you just decided to get involved.
If the Bootland Tootoo incident is unfair, then the Tucker Bouillion fight is unfair. If the the Tucker Bouillion fight is fair, then so is the Bootland Tootoo! | Reply |
no.7
Mar 17, 2007 12:38 ET | Don't give up. If someone comes up with Detroit feed of the Bootland-Tootoo, it may reveal something which can't be seen on the Nashville feed. The same goes for any camcorder footage.
In any case, if any of our fair/unfair calls are wrong, it's only a matter of when, not if, they will be corrected. One day, Darryl Bootland himself may tell us what exactly his intention was in the Tootoo incident. And if Darcy Tucker ever manages to pursuade us that his intention was to draw a penalty in the Bouillon fight, we'll re-consider this fight too. I can't really see that happening, but one never knows. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 17, 2007 14:36 ET | Yeah! and when that happens I'll change my userID to Mr.Blue, cause that will be me holding my breath and making inaccurate reviews. | Reply |
Brawls26
Mar 19, 2007 15:09 ET | Did both players have their gloves off? No.
Did at least one of the players receive a fighting major? No.
Were the refs interfering during the scrum? Yes.
Gotta love the Tucker/Leaf haters, this wasn't a fair fight. | Reply |
MarkV
Mar 19, 2007 17:26 ET | Agreed! | Reply |
pindude61
Mar 19, 2007 17:32 ET | i love that it goes from 3 to 10 on the fun factor. | Reply |
MarkV
Apr 11, 2007 17:43 ET | You still did not reply to my request to change this to an unfair fight as highlighted and outlined in out very own rules. Please make the correct call otherwise give me a very good answer as to why. It is obvious that it was a sucker punch when Tucker only gave Bouillion "shoves", and 2, when the lines came in Bouillion then took the opportunity to thrwo his punch (referee intereference)
I thank you in advance in replying to this! | Reply |
SarcasticPillow
Dec 15, 2007 18:15 ET | The hits and TKO scrap.
| Reply |